- About Us
- Our Talent
- Our Work
- All Practice Areas
- Appellate Litigation
- Commercial Litigation
- Cybersecurity and Data Privacy
- Employment, Discrimination, and Sexual Misconduct
- FCPA and Anti-Corruption
- Investigations and Crisis Management
- Public Interest Litigation
- Regulatory and Securities Matters and Litigation
- White Collar Criminal Defense
- Contact Us
Kaplan & Company, LLP Files Amicus Brief in the Supreme Court of the United States in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd., v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
October 30, 2017
Kaplan & Company, LLP has filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd., v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The brief was filed on behalf of leading scholars of religious liberty and constitutional law.
Jack Phillips is the proprietor of Masterpiece Cakeshop, a bakery in Colorado that produces bespoke cakes for special events. In 2012, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, who had recently been married in Massachusetts, asked Phillips to bake a cake for a post-wedding celebration in Colorado. Phillips refused, saying that he could not bake a cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding consistently with his Christian beliefs. This refusal to serve Craig and Mullins because of their sexual orientation violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA). Masterpiece presents the question whether the Free Speech Clause or the Free Exercise Clause forbid the application of CADA to Phillips under these circumstances.
Kaplan & Company’s brief addresses Phillips’ religious liberty claim. The brief acknowledges that Phillips faces a painful dilemma caused by a conflict between his religious beliefs and his legal obligations. However, the brief explains that CADA creates an “even playing field in commerce," and operates in a neutral and generally applicable manner. Phillips’ argument ultimately amounts to a claim that “religious people—but nobody else—should be deemed exempt from the most basic rules that define civil treatment in commerce and social life.” As such, Phillips’ claim is foreclosed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, which recognizes that religious liberty does not mean that “each conscience is a law unto itself”.
Read the full brief HERE.
More news from our Newsroom
Published on: January 17, 2020
Plus: We debunk four big myths about setting people free before their trials.
Published on: January 14, 2020
Former Justice Department Executive Marshall L. Miller Joins as Partner SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney Mike Ferrara to Join as Counsel
Published on: December 16, 2019
NEW YORK, NY, December 16, 2019 – Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP is delighted to announce that Founding Partner Roberta (“Robbie”) Kaplan and Managing Partner Julie Fink have been named to Crain’s New... Read More