Kaplan Hecker & Fink Files Amicus Brief in Garner v. Colorado

By: 
Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
Published on:
September 3, 2019

State and federal courts have split in answering a profoundly important question: whether the Due Process Clause imposes any limitations on in-court eyewitness identifications made under suggestive circumstances, where there is strong reason to doubt the reliability of the identification. On behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Kaplan Hecker and Fink has filed an amicus brief asking the United States Supreme Court to resolve that split by granting a petition for certiorari in Garner v. Colorado. This amicus brief explains that the split in judicial authority is deep and intractable, and that there is a compelling need for due process checks on suggestive in-court eyewitness identifications.

Read the Amicus Brief here.

More news from our Newsroom

Published on: February 22, 2021

Sean Hecker Recognized as Leading Litigator in “Litigation: Trial Lawyers – USA” and “FCPA – USA” by Chambers & Partners

NEW YORK, NY, February 22, 2021 – Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP is pleased to announce that partner Sean Hecker has been recognized as a leading attorney in the 2021 Chambers & Partners Global... Read More
Published on: February 16, 2021

Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and Public Rights Project File Amicus Brief Opposing Threat to Vital Health and Safety Protections

On February 12, 2021, lawyers from Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, along with co-counsel at Public Rights Project, filed an amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, a... Read More
Published on: February 11, 2021

2021 Summer Associate Hassaan Shahawy Named President of Harvard Law Review

NEW YORK, NY, February 11, 2021 – Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP is pleased to announce that incoming summer associate Hassaan Shahawy has been named president of the Harvard Law Review. Shahawy is the... Read More