Kaplan Hecker & Fink Files Amicus Brief in Garner v. Colorado

By: 
Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
Published on:
September 3, 2019

State and federal courts have split in answering a profoundly important question: whether the Due Process Clause imposes any limitations on in-court eyewitness identifications made under suggestive circumstances, where there is strong reason to doubt the reliability of the identification. On behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Kaplan Hecker and Fink has filed an amicus brief asking the United States Supreme Court to resolve that split by granting a petition for certiorari in Garner v. Colorado. This amicus brief explains that the split in judicial authority is deep and intractable, and that there is a compelling need for due process checks on suggestive in-court eyewitness identifications.

Read the Amicus Brief here.

More news from our Newsroom

Published on: January 17, 2020

New York Politicians Are Using Anti-Semitic Attacks to Scare People About Bail Reform

Plus: We debunk four big myths about setting people free before their trials.
Published on: January 14, 2020

Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP Bolsters White Collar Capabilities with Top Prosecutor Hires

Former Justice Department Executive Marshall L. Miller Joins as Partner SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney Mike Ferrara to Join as Counsel
Published on: December 16, 2019

Roberta Kaplan and Julie Fink Named to Crain’s Notable Women in Law List for 2020

NEW YORK, NY, December 16, 2019 – Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP is delighted to announce that Founding Partner Roberta (“Robbie”) Kaplan and Managing Partner Julie Fink have been named to Crain’s New... Read More