Kaplan Hecker & Fink Files Amicus Brief in Garner v. Colorado

By: 
Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
Published on:
September 3, 2019

State and federal courts have split in answering a profoundly important question: whether the Due Process Clause imposes any limitations on in-court eyewitness identifications made under suggestive circumstances, where there is strong reason to doubt the reliability of the identification. On behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Kaplan Hecker and Fink has filed an amicus brief asking the United States Supreme Court to resolve that split by granting a petition for certiorari in Garner v. Colorado. This amicus brief explains that the split in judicial authority is deep and intractable, and that there is a compelling need for due process checks on suggestive in-court eyewitness identifications.

Read the Amicus Brief here.

More news from our Newsroom

Published on: January 11, 2022

Opinion: Trump wants the Jan. 6 suits against him dismissed. Why he's on shaky ground.

In their new op-ed, founding partner Roberta (“Robbie”) Kaplan, partner Joshua Matz, and partner Ray Tolentino explain how former President Trump has sought to avoid legal responsibility for his role... Read More
Published on: January 5, 2022

Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP Expands Commercial Litigation Practice with Addition of Timothy S. Martin

Timothy S. (“Tim”) Martin joins the firm as partner in New York
Published on: December 30, 2021

Opinion: White supremacists are using an old playbook but so are the lawyers fighting them

On Tuesday, founding partner Roberta Kaplan and Karen Dunn, partner at Paul, Weiss and co-counsel in Kaplan Hecker & Fink's Charlottesville lawsuit, published an op-ed in The Washington Post,... Read More